"I don't really know how accepted I am," says Robert Pattinson as he sips on an enormous paper cup of Coke. "Nothing
ever matters to me apart from the people with negative opinions. That's
literally it. That always drives me on to the next thing. It's funny,
you just focus on them and then the next movie. That's the only thing
you're thinking about when it comes out."
For someone with
the world at his feet – he has the Twilight franchise behind him and
David Cronenberg's icy drama Cosmopolis as his next release – Pattinson
gives a good impression of a man plagued with self-doubt. "I've never
really taken myself seriously as an actor," he says, fresh off a plane
from Germany, where, he notes by the by, everybody seems to hate him.
"It is surprising the amount of people who think I'm going to be really dumb," he says. "I
think they think anyone who has done teen movies is just an idiot. I
don't know, maybe I am. Some of the best actors, if you talk to them,
they're not the smartest people in the world."
Eric
Packer, the character Pattison plays in Cosmopolis is not stupid. The
film, an adaptation of Don DeLillo's 2003 novel set mostly in Packer's
limousine, concerns a financial whiz-kid who is either having sex,
having a finger inserted into his bottom (an on-the-move prostate exam),
engaging in lengthy overblown monologues, losing vast sums of money,
dodging an assassin, seeking a haircut, or all of the above. The film
premiered at this year's Cannes film festival. The majority of reviews
have been positive, particularly in Pattinson's favour, but frankly, it
could have gone either way. It is not the most easily palatable of
films.
'It's so different to
other films, and that's one of the reasons I wanted to do it. You read
the script and you're like, "Is this actually getting made? It's set in a
car, there's so much talking about experimental economics"'
"It's funny. It got such divisive reactions in Cannes," Pattinson says, before confessing to having compulsively sought out those reactions himself. "I
was sitting in the car on the way back from the press conference,
refreshing, refreshing, refreshing on my phone. I've never really done
anything where people have hated it, or really, really read into it.
It's so different to other films, and that's one of the reasons I wanted
to do it. You read the script and you're like, 'Is this actually
getting made? It's set in a car, there's so much talking about
experimental economics, and it's getting a wide release? But I think
that's important, I would do a lot to get movies like that into the
cinema again. There is some weird thing that's happened where the only
thing that can be shown is a superhero movie that has cost $250m to
make. It's the most ridiculous thing ever."
Of course,
Pattinson has had his own part in that ridiculousness. By playing
abstemious bloodsucker Edward Cullen in the five-part Twilight franchise
(the final instalment of which comes out this winter) he has made
studio Summit Entertainment two and a half billion dollars and himself
into an international teen sex object. Moving on from that role will not
be easy, and this is not Pattinson's first attempt at departure.
There was also, to name but two, this year's Bel Ami, the adaptation of the 1885 French novel, which, as Pattinson puts it, "kind of came and went",
and Water For Elephants (2011), another relatively underwhelming book
adaptation in which he co-starred with Reese Witherspoon as a circus
vet. Neither particularly helped him to break into the acting
mainstream. Now it's Cosmopolis, and a role Pattinson seems equally
thrilled and baffled about.
"It's like nothing I'd really done before, and I didn't really understand it,"
says Pattinson, 26, now chewing on a toothpick, partly to rid himself
of the remnants of a quarter pounder with cheese and partly because he
is trying to give up smoking.
"I kept asking David, 'What have you seen?' I just thought, 'Please don't let this be a financing thing.'" He pauses. "But
you need to piggy back on other people's credibility, because people
are so judgmental. Once you've made one impression, that's it. I planned
for it to take ten years for that to dissipate, so to get into Cannes
the year that [Twilight] is finishing was fairly ridiculous."
Cannes,
it seems, was a huge deal for Pattinson. While he and girlfriend
Kristen Stewart, his co-star in the Twilight movies, became paparazzi
and fan obsessions overnight, you sense that he has yet to make peace
with his fame. A reluctant heart-throb, today he wears a black cap, a
grey shirt over an off-white T-shirt, black jeans and black trainers.
There is nothing about him that says superstar, give or take the
chiseled features and minder outside. Neither is there much that
projects the confidence you'd expect of someone who'd driven themselves
to the top of one of the world's most competitive industries.
"Everybody liked [Cronenberg's] A History of Violence and Eastern Promises, but they're much more accessible than this," he says. "That
made me nervous, because I thought everyone wants to see Viggo
Mortensen shooting people, and this is just sitting around talking about
currency markets. But the first few reviews were pretty good, and I've
never really felt like that with a movie. It's definitely the
best-reviewed thing I've ever done. Most of the time, I don't read them,
especially with the Twlight films, where people are overwhelmed by what
their opinion of the cultural relevance of it is. But with this, I read
a lot, and I was terrified."
Cosmopolis, without any
actual intent, has found itself tapping into the zeitgeist. Just as
shooting on the film commenced, so did the Occupy movement. In the
movie, Packer is driven through New York City, through protest after
protest about the failings of a capitalist society. In life, Pattinson
found the images he was filming being mirrored on news channels.
Once again, however, his memories are tinted with ambivalence. "I remember when Occupy happened in LA," he says. "I
knew a bunch of actors who went down to it. They all drove down there,
because no one takes the train, and parked one stop away, because they
didn't want to be seen driving their free Audis, and then got on the
train. I was like, 'What are you doing? You're probably ruining it for
the other people!' I guess that's kind of a bubble; you want to say
things, but you are being hypocritical. I've never really been in a
position to give my opinion on political stuff before, it doesn't really
come up. But suddenly you've got to take an enormous amount of
responsibility."
'I was always shit at auditions. Since Twilight, I've done two. One of them was for a job I'm doing now and it was really hard'
Pattinson's
career to this point hasn't given him much of an opportunity to develop
a huge rapport with an audience of his own age, or older. But Pattinson
is also an interesting casting for Cronenberg. The director's most
recent outing, A Dangerous Method, had Michael Fassbender spanking Keira
Knightley, while Viggo Mortensen analyzed their every move (Mortensen,
of course, being a favorite of his). But, from almost every interview
that has come from Cronenberg, it seems that he does not have a single
regret about plucking Patinson from teenage dreams to front such complex
subject matter. And while Pattinson admits getting his head around the
script was no mean feat, you sense he hopes the commitment to justifying
Cronenberg's risk-taking could change his career.
"When I got this part," he says, adjusting his cap, "every
single article that came out, was, 'R-Patz's struggle for
credibility!'; I don't understand who invented that thing, 'R-Patz', I
want to strangle them. But once you've made that step, everything
afterwards is not like, 'R-Patz's continuing struggle for credibility!'
You've got to come up with something else, so it gets a little bit
easier. I was always shit at auditions. Since Twilight, I've done two.
One of them was for a job I'm doing now and it was really hard. Two
really, really long auditions that everybody was going up for. I was so
happy afterwards when I got it. And it was purely because of Cosmopolis
that I was thinking, 'You can go and do this as an actor, rather than
just as the guy from Twilight, because you've got some foreign value
now.'"
For every positive review, it will be the negative
that stays with Robert Pattinson. But if our conversation is anything to
go by, it seems that he's shaking off the self-censorship that came
with being the face of a massive movie brand. If that happens, he might
just start to enjoy himself, too.
via
No comments:
Post a Comment